• DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I agree.

      Boy Scouts used to get jack knives in 3rd grade.

      My pacifist mom brought me all the guns I wanted when I was a kid; by the time I was about 12 I decided guns were for little boys and put all of mine away. Never felt the need to own one.

            • Saapas@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              22 hours ago

              It’s cheap and effective against invaders, sometimes when you’re in bind you need to use terrible tools

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Depends on how you use the gun. But that’s the thing about landmines, you “plant” them rather than “use” them, and pure fate alone is the arbiter of the mine’s “use.” Landmines kill indiscriminately, they don’t care what team you’re on, how old you are, if you’re even a combatant at all or just a 6yo civilian child, but a gun at least requires a person to make the decision to act or not. It is for this reason that I contend while guns can be (not always are) used morally, landmines cannot, even when they do happen to find a “correct” target.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      People are utterly terrified by the idea of something that could cause consequences if wielded improperly.

      Or, stated another way:

      People are terrified not just of accountability, but of potential, theoretical accountability.

      Hyperconsumerism?

      0 attention span?

      Things are supposed to all be instant, temporary and ephemeral, nothing that implies the potential of long term consequences can be considered without a level of genuine terror.

      • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I had never thought of it that way. You are absolutely correct on the accountability.

    • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t get it, it’s like self infantilizing. Their mommies cut up their food for them.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think a sizeable factor for the disdain is that EDC-bro that everyone knows who use their knife for everything even when the proper tool is right next to them. Or even the ones who carry an assault-type knife (like a karambit) holstered on their belt just for showing it off.

      Those specific people sorta remind me of those fedora-bros where they think of it as an status symbol.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m flabbergasted as to how you managed to live long enough to learn the English language, and never had to, like, open a box

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Tell that to the EU beurocracts that put a stupid tab in the plastic bottle caps that I now have to cut.

      • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        When I worked at a fast food place I would bring a knife every day, because one of the things you do a lot of is opening boxes and bags and tearing them open with gloves on sucks ass. You seem to be under the impression that pocket knives are chainsaws lol

        • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          You should have asked for a utility knife or box cutter. If you got hurt using your knife, the company could easily draw out and possibly dismiss a WC claim citing unauthorized equipment.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I had a shitty job where I was opening lots of boxes for one of my duties but no cutting implements were provided. I asked and it was gently implied that sharp implements would not be provided to anyone in the building and that brining your own was strongly frowned upon. That was…interesting

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Knife access is needed frequently enough to warrant at least a nice a little slip joint. You can use them to trim loose threads, open boxes, trim plastic tabs/flashings, dig out splinters, remove bee stings…

        My wife asks to borrow a knife most days, and when I’m not carrying one, she gets flustered, yet refuse to bring her own.

      • brap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Depends on the knife really. Even just a 1” non-locking blade on a multitool has excellent utility.

        It’s a balance between usefulness and looking like a Crocodile Dundee cosplayer. You take what’s appropriate for where you’re going.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would say that locking blades a generally safer for the user than a non-locking blade.

          • brap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Absolutely. Sometimes jobs exceed the abilities of a non-locker and then it gets dangerous.

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          1 day ago

          A smaller blade is less dangerous but not safe. You wouldn’t give a 3 year old a multitool with an exposed knife.

          And the second part of the argument was that you don’t need that utility all the time. 99% of the society can get their things done without carrying a knife around.

          Thus someone constantly carrying around a potentially dangerous tool would look weird. I’m sure a hammer would also have great versatility but when you see someone casually lugging a hammer around you wouldn’t find it weird?

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            A smaller blade is less dangerous but not safe. You wouldn’t give a 3 year old a multitool with an exposed knife.

            You wouldn’t let a 3 year old cook dinner for himself either. A guy owning an oven is a huge red flag

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            “A toddler shouldn’t have one, so there’s no reason to ever carry one.”

            Do you even listen to yourself?

            • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Uhh… They mentioned a toddler to enforce the argument that a knife, regardless of size, still carries an inherent risk of cutting oneself.

              • village604@adultswim.fan
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                22 hours ago

                And a pencil carries an inherent risk of poking ones self. Is it unreasonable to carry a pencil with you?

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You can do 99% of things without carrying a GPS, phone, internet browser, 3 cameras, a compass, an MP3 player, a TV and contents of the Library of Congress around, but no one bats an eye about someone bringing their modern smartphone literally everywhere.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Knives are dangerous. No argument there. Hell, my car keys can be dangerous too. But they are also utilitarian in a lot of different and innocent situations. Having a simple pocket knife is not a bad idea.

        1. Cutting open boxes
        2. Cutting wire or string or that flat plastic tie used in packing
        3. Stripping wire
        4. Dislodging items
        5. Scraping things
        6. Peeling apples
        7. Whittling

        The point is, I’d be less concerned about somebody having a pocket knife than a gun. But, that may be because I’m from the South and it’s more common down here; not that guns aren’t common, but that knives are very common.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        This does depend on where you live. In a dense city where you always have access to stores and services, it’s not as vital. Meanwhile someone who lives and works in an isolated area would want to keep more tools on them or in their vehicle (flashlight, first aid kit, lighter, multitool/knife, etc)

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        24 hours ago

        turns out knife nuts are just as stupid and crazy as gun nuts…

        Best to just ignore the type of person who carries a weapon like a women carries a full makeup kit.

        Both do it for the same reason, impressing men but neither will acknowledge it and get irrationally defensive if it’s pointed out.

        If this wasn’t true, they would be downvoting, they’d just ignore it and move on, like a real man but they can’t because they aren’t.

        • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The opinel I carry only seems like a weapon to the weakest and softest whiny diaperbabies.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I have no skin in this game, but you just proved their point. You’re irrationally defensive in here, it’s intense.

            Really bad vibes.

          • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            17 hours ago

            People need comforting lies. The weakest use sarcasm as a substitute for intelligent discourse.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can you explain in detail HOW knives are dangerous? Like more dangerous than the internal combustion engine.

        • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          They might cut their fingers while using it to cut their food, they haven’t graduated to forks yet so the likelihood of it is high. And that’s with mom’s supervision.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            A knife is about as “inherently dangerous” as milk. Properly kept, it’s never going to be an issue. Accidently leave it on the floor, and someone can slip or get cut.

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Being responsible dos not remove a danger from existence. Accidents can still happen. Intent can change. The danger is always present. You even acknowledge this in n your last sentence.

              Yes, being responsible and respectful of a dangerous item (e.g. knife, gun, whatever) is always good, and will minimize the danger. But the danger is always present, and thus always requires the responsibility and respect.

              I still believe my original point stands.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                My point was that spilled milk is just as, if not more dangerous than a knife. Everything in life has a degree of risk. Part of being an adult is managing or accepting those risks. You can roll off your bed and get hurt, does this mean that there is no place in society for bedframes? Perfectly healthy people are going to die or get seriously injured from falling down stairs today, shouldn’t we ban multi-level housing as a response? Probably hundreds of people are going to get cut or die from a knives today, is that a reason not to carry one?

                For me, no. I have lots of useful things I do daily with a knife. Not carrying a knife when I needed one has caused me many more issues than carrying a knife when I didn’t. However, if you live in a perfect pampered world where you never need to cut, slice, open, poke, pry, trim, shave or shape anything, I could see why carrying a little pocket folder might be an unnecessary risk. I live in a safe place where crime is low and dangerous wild animals are few, so I don’t carry a firearm, it’s an unnecessary risk and an uncomfortable inconvenience for what I would get out of it.

                • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  You seem to have come under the impression that I’m against knives.

                  I am not.

                  I was also calling HikingVet out for what I believe was a bad faith argument.

                  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    Hey dude, you are more likely to be fatality injured by an engine in your day to day life. The comparison was to point out the absurdity of the hysterical method which people use to adress the topic of knives. So…

              • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                The danger is always present. Hahaha, like the knife I have folded in my pocket might suddenly attack me at any moment.