• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Given what it would have taken to get a picture with lighting like that on film, I would guess this was a pre planned shoot that just happened have the towers as a back drop that day. Most of the footage we have of the first tower is from people who were doing other things with their cameras and camcorders at that time.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That wasn’t moments after the plane hit. Given the smoke, they had time to arrange that shot.

      I don’t know the situation, but at worst it comes across as crass. Perhaps they were going for a “solemn” look, but it has more of an “artistic” look. Not that it’s a particularly good composition…

      • pornpornporn@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        TBF the culture around taking photos was very different before smartphones. It looks really bad by 2025 standards because we’re used to taking a dozen pictures of our faces in front of every tourist attraction, but in 2001 selfies weren’t a thing, she’s just taking a picture of a remarkable event