Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 30 days agoSo 5 stars thenlemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1572arrow-down14
arrow-up1568arrow-down1external-linkSo 5 stars thenlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 30 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·30 days agoYour version was worse, I understood the original just fine.
minus-square__反いじめ戦隊@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·30 days agoHow would u write it so my former confusion wouldn’t misread?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·30 days agoI’m not sure, it made sense to me.
minus-square__反いじめ戦隊@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·edit-230 days agoIt didn’t to me at first read, and my upvoter. Now, if I was in a similar position, I would respond: Case No. #####, the poster above was an opponent that lost against my case against es.
Your version was worse, I understood the original just fine.
How would u write it so my former confusion wouldn’t misread?
I’m not sure, it made sense to me.
It didn’t to me at first read, and my upvoter.
Now, if I was in a similar position, I would respond: