Halfway through he describes this as malicious compliance with the “right to repair” law. Apple and others are making a mockery of the law.
Halfway through he describes this as malicious compliance with the “right to repair” law. Apple and others are making a mockery of the law.
Because I personally feel that he is an alarmist who blows a lot of l shit out of proportion, despite generally agreeing with the principles behind him doing what he does.
It’s okay to not like someone’s content and take on things. it also doesn’t necessarily mean that I’m not aligned with the basic premise of his work in other cases. I just don’t like how he represents the topics or the degree to which he inflates their importance.