• mienshao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve always felt like Signal isn’t half as secure as it claims to be, and articles like this don’t help that feeling…

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      why is this downvoted? its not even that wild a comment. Signal fans need to chill a bit.

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s as secure as it can be in the modern world really.

      But none of the technology matters if you let an FBI agent into your super secure encrypted group chat.

    • THX-1138@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why’s that exactly… who’s not to say they just joined the huge group undercover? Or randomly added to a sensitive group aka the journalist debacle a few months ago.

      • mienshao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m literally just talking, giving an opinion. Nothing was that fucking deep, just talking about my feelings about how a supposedly secure encrypted website was infiltrated by the motherfucking FBI…

        And I’m downvoted? Fucking why? Every day Lemmy gets a little more like Reddit. Shit like this is why the numbers go down. Just spread that negativity—make everyone feel like shit.

        Downvote this while you’re at it! Fuck yall!

        • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Your feelings and opinion are wrong in this case.

          They could mislead people into sharing your opinion/feeling and then you’d both be wrong.

          You’re getting downvoted because you’re wrong and are contributing the opposite of a benefit to a conversation around the security of signal without any facts or proof other than your “gut”.

          That is not upvote worthy. People are correct to downvote your comment to let others know that they shouldn’t take it with any degree of seriousness. That’s how this works. That’s how the whole comment voting system is supposed to work.

          Your feelings are not special when they muddy the waters of facts.

        • eodur@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Many subscribe to the “vote on comments based on how useful the information is” theory, myself included. Based on that your feeling, despite how valuable it is to you personally, isn’t particularly valuable to the discussion. Its not personal.