• ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Shit like that doesn’t need to be debated.

    Even in Ancient Rome they had a grain dole that… paid for itself! With interest! Because the poor who would otherwise struggle to buy wheat or barley got it, and could buy other stuff, even luxury items. The result is that more and more trade flowed directly to Rome and people made a bundle doing it.

    And also less hungry people means less desperate people and it means more stability. Something that basically everyone wants.

    But yes, these same right-wing grifters even attacked the grain dole in Ancient Rome as if it lead to the fall of the Roman Empire.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But giving away grain to peasants is why the entire empire fell to ruin! Letting people starve is the most humane way of reducing hunger in the long run, it just takes strong leadership to do what most be done. Really, it’ll be faster, easier, and cheaper (which is by definition better for everyone) if we help accelerate things. Which will be the next bit of societal tough love that Crowder will be taking the high road on.