• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s not about the screen, it’s about the content.

    Every new technology has detractors saying it’s going to ruin the children. Books were bad, then radio, then TV, then phones. The medium isn’t the issue. There is an issue with the short form content that is predominantly watched on phones though, but it isn’t the fault of the phone.

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 minutes ago

      No. No its the algorithms.

      Short form content is probably not too terrible.

      It’s the algorithms trying to sloppify us.

      We’re not using the heroin for surgery or fun, we’re using it to chain workers so they ho through withdrawl if they try to run away.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yes I am kind of joking. The problem is, we have seen over time, books aren’t evil or bad (sounds like religious nutjubbery to me there) however we have found how bad these devices are because they are constantly dinging and giving you dopamine highs. Tell me this; will a toddler be more likely addicted to a book, or a shiny flashy iPad (that can later be leveraged by corporations into an addiction to fortnight crates/loot box shit). So in that way, yes, the screens are bad. Now I use my phone often times for reading, but you know what 99% of the population is using it for ? Mindless 6 second tik tok brainrot. Its definitely not a good thing.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Yeah, like I said, it’s the content that’s bad. You could have a phone without any of these issues. Mine mostly doesn’t, because I don’t use any of these media services or social media, besides Lemmy if you count that.