• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    He explained he was trying to approach it as an average user. But that seems disengenous to me. That warning was scary as fuck. Anyone stupid enough to go far out of their way to break their system against very strong warnings, gets what they get. The average users I know wouldn’t have done that unless they were pretty much done trying and didn’t care if it broke their system anyhow

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Windows says shit like “This may harm your computer” for just about anything, especially installing software. Windows users are trained to ignore warnings like that, warnings in Linux are serious.

      On the other hand, yes. Reading what is on a computer screen is beyond 117.9% of the population.

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This is basically my take on it. Windows has conditioned me to ignore any and all warnings. It would be super easy for me fall into a trap like that on Linux.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Disagree to all.

        Reading what is on a computer screen is beyond 117.9% of the population

        Then I guess there would have been no problem there, since you have to read the screen and then type or copy/paste an explicit statement that is essentially impossible to miss. This was not “warning blah blah blah. OK/Cancel” that could be glossed over.