bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 25 days agoLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down151
arrow-up17arrow-down1imageLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlbubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 25 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·24 days agoThe US and our lackeys, yes
minus-squarebalance8873@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-224 days agoBut don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·24 days agoIt would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agowhat are some of the other indicators?
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·24 days agoWho are those lackeys?
The US and our lackeys, yes
But don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
It would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
what are some of the other indicators?
US military bases
Who are those lackeys?