• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those artists at least had a recognizable and identifiable style. It was easy to mimic yes, but they became icons for the identifiable style. If Altman snuck this in to the museum I’d give him some credit for it I suppose, but the style already exists and isn’t novel or identiable to a particular artist. Other people have snuck crap into museums too. There’s no novelty or creativity or unique iconic style here. It’s just sludge.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Yes the bar for what is art is so low as to be buried.

          That’s the god damn point. Anyone can make art. That’s the whole damn reason uptight asswads get upset when something new shows up and reminds them of that fact.

          What matters is what the viewer think, if they believe it art then thus it is.

          I do not believe the paint by number crayon drawing of a 4 year old is of value thus it is not art to me. But to their father and mother? It is of the highest value and the highest form of art.

        • Postimo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, it’s called performance art. You’re not wrong in disliking it as slop, but the barrier for what is art is empirically low.