They explain directly in the updated paper why they changed things around … Those topics are literally just outside the scope of that particular paper.
but they weren’t outside the scope of their previous position.
No, they are not making a weaker claim at all, especially given they make the exact same claims on their other website I already linked to. You are seriously one of the most obnoxiously dishonest, bad faith actors I have ever come across. Get your head out of your ass.
There’s nothing honest or rigorous about your commentary. You’re clearly a troll, plain and simple. I’m just going to keep calling you out for being full of shit.
you’re calling me names and ignoring the scientific guidance, and how it has changed. you’re clearly intolerant to intellectual honesty and scientific rigor.
but they weren’t outside the scope of their previous position.
it’s clear they are making a weaker claim.
No, they are not making a weaker claim at all, especially given they make the exact same claims on their other website I already linked to. You are seriously one of the most obnoxiously dishonest, bad faith actors I have ever come across. Get your head out of your ass.
if you don’t like intellectual honesty and scientific rigor, I’ll be happy to help you find the block button
There’s nothing honest or rigorous about your commentary. You’re clearly a troll, plain and simple. I’m just going to keep calling you out for being full of shit.
you’re calling me names and ignoring the scientific guidance, and how it has changed. you’re clearly intolerant to intellectual honesty and scientific rigor.