• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Because it is much easier to make that sort of contract than measure some objective “work done” metric. Unless you’re hoping to be signing piecework/work by tender contracts all the time.

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      My employer mandates 40h of work per week and a core working time where all employees are supposed to be available. No fixed hours required. I don’t see how fixing hours is easier than that.

      And ultimately, that is my point: Why set fixed times, if the time itself doesn’t actually matter?

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s hardly a good reason to continue doing it. I consider it easiest to just let me work whenever I want to and stop worrying about how much.

          If there’s no big consequence to starting a few minutes later, Employers shouldn’t be so anal about it. It’s a waste of everyone’s time and will probably cost more time and productivity than those few minutes I wasn’t gonna be super productive anyway.

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean for the employer it’s a fine reason. If they didn’t get their way with that then they’d probably have to figure out a different system. But right now most workers have set hours