Can’t you use a VPN and route your traffic outside of your country?
I am on VPN 24/7 changing countries made no difference
Do you use your google acccount? If so, try without it You can use newpipe or invidious btw
For me what worked is restating the router. I read that you use VPN, so I don’t know I it will work.
In what country?
The land of imperialism
That is not a small list.
Tampermonkey extension still works for me to unlock age-restricted videos. Is it having issues for you?
If you don’t have it, check out these two links:
https://greasyfork.org/en/help/installing-user-scripts
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/521089-youtube-age-restriction-bypass-stealth-version
It’s got instructions for nearly every browser. Once you have the extension you can install whichever scripts you like. I mostly use it for verification bypass but there’s a lot of other cool stuff you can do too.
There’s a user script for this that I hope works for you: https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/521089-youtube-age-restriction-bypass-stealth-version
Last time a fake id worked, just searched for an id sample online and gimped it to match the name and the date on the google acc.
Didn’t even have to change the default photo.
This was some years ago, idk if it still works tho.
Might have to do that
if all fails i can highly recommend invidious. you can also import your youtube subscriptions
good luck OP
EDIT: yea… age restricted videos are off the table though.
How did you do it before?
Wasn’t there a website where you could get ai photos and videos for this?
Is there? I have no idea
Black male people look according to this site all the same no matter the age?
Probably a lack of data in the training set. It reminds me of the early versions of facial recognition software which had trouble telling not just black people apart, but also women of all ages and white men below a certain age. It was because these early versions had only been trained on photos of employees at the company, and they were mostly older white men.
Eh, not like most algos that will check can tell black people apart anyway
It almost certainly won’t work but I’d be curious if any test credit card numbers work for that purpose. They still pass the Luhn algorithm, but I’m guessing Google is still gonna reach out to some service to verify the CC details.
Test cards: https://docs.stripe.com/testing
Credit card is the best of the options. There are all sorts of strict rules and restrictions about how companies store and use credit card information. Those rules don’t exist for the other options.
I don’t want to give any of my info to Google though
Compromise is always the game.
You either comprise by not using YouTube anymore, or you compromise by giving them the most tightly restricted information they’ll accept.You’ll never have perfect privacy. I guarentee Google already has a supressing amount of info on you. At least this is officially protected. Once you give the card as proof, you can probably delete it from their saved data. And they have to honor that, both by law and contracts with Visa etc.
Do not listen to this guy.
You’re literally in Gestapo times and talking about “compromising” sensitive personal information, like they wouldn’t be able to track you down in an instant with a few breadcrumbs.
Well yah. I mentioned not using YouTube anymore. That’s a viable option.
So is moving to the wilderness somewhere, and living off the grid.
Or to a poor country where it’s isn’t financially worthwhile to for companies to track everyone.
That’s full identity verification giving them a credit card. They may be required to delete the card, but they aren’t going to be required to delete a record that says we confirmed the identity of this account with a credit card on this date. If you don’t want your name and social security number tied to your google account don’t give them your credit card.
Frankly though, we all know google is the worst of the worst for privacy. Bypassing the age verification will only by OP time.
You’re right but people don’t want to acknowledge it.
I’m waiting for the change in T&Cs to basically say “If you don’t watch enough ads, you will be auto subscribed to YT premium using the ccard on file”
That’s one of the restrictions. If they try to do that, you just call Visa and cancel the charge. Then Visa will fight with Google to get their money back.
I wonder if a temporary credit card will work maybe?
That’s an idea. It might. I don’t know
Have you tried mirrors?
It doesn’t work for age restricted videos
No, I mean people who post youtube videos to other platforms.
Can you try to make a new account? Or use any of the YouTube frontends?
I tried, but it doesn’t work for age restricted videos. I tend to use Freetube whenever possible, and only swap to other options when I am forced for age restriction.
Why would you want to?
Assume he is an adult. Explain why he should.
Should what? I didn’t say he should anything…?
The same question could be asked of your original comment. Go ahead and expand on what you meant by “why would he want to?”, then I’ll explain what I meant by my reply.
I don’t debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don’t care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don’t waste more time.
Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after.
Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not?
I doesn’t matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet…
Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn’t try to avoid the age check.
Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those.
Yes, it could be both… But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it’s what I’m commenting on…
In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too…
The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as “the logical assumption” there were other options. I’m sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future
