ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agoCivil rights is cookedlockdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1636arrow-down136file-text
arrow-up1600arrow-down1imageCivil rights is cookedlockdiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agomessage-square100fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWanderingThoughts@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up34·1 day agoAnd the conclusion is that you need a system that allows multiple parties to get some competition going instead of winner takes all.
minus-squaredreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-219 hours agowhich party is fighting for that at the national level? I don’t hear the sound of democrats falling over each other to start promoting more parties in govt. Not even going to consider the republicans.
minus-squareSaraTonin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·18 hours agoBetter yet, a system which requires co-operation between different parties
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·16 hours agoWe already have that. They’re all working together in the same buildings and serving the same disgustingly privileged people.
And the conclusion is that you need a system that allows multiple parties to get some competition going instead of winner takes all.
which party is fighting for that at the national level? I don’t hear the sound of democrats falling over each other to start promoting more parties in govt. Not even going to consider the republicans.
Better yet, a system which requires co-operation between different parties
We already have that. They’re all working together in the same buildings and serving the same disgustingly privileged people.