• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago
    1. it’s not AI, regardless of how many idiots repeat that bullshit. It is machine learning with glorified pattern recognition.

    2. Why would anyone want to enter the market? It has no practical use that justifies the energy consumption. Because it is not targeted, for every individual application, there are much more efficient ways to accomolish the same/better results for much less energy.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s good enough to answer most questions and it will only get better. Even if it is not AI it is a tool that knowledge workers use and will need to stay competitive.

      And looking at the size of EU investments, only China will build competitors so these companies will own the market.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s good enough to answer most questions and it will only get better.

        Reality indicates the opposite.

        Even if it is not AI it is a tool that knowledge workers use and will need to stay competitive.

        People who use machine learned systems to handle “knowledge” will dilute actual knowledge with billions of factual errors and fuck up mankinds knowledge base.