• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    And a partial refund at that.

    Better option would be to require the senior Deloitte partners and managers to do real community service program (live-in junior janitor at homeless shelter or a hospice) for 6 months (with an asset freeze for the duration of community service).

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s ridiculous. The fact that a significant part of the report was clearly fraudulent calls into question the merit of the entire report. How could anyone take it seriously after finding dozens of fraudulent sources? They should sue to recover 100% of what was paid.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I still think personal responsibility (as outlined in my post above) is a far better option that a fine.

        A fine is the cost of business. I don’t think a senior Deloitte partner or manager would like to do a 6 month mandatory de-mining community service program (Australia can send them to my country, Ukraine, as part of a community service exchange program).

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Partners and managers (at least senior ones) are held accountable for profitability. A fine directly hits their bonuses. But holding the partners personally liable for fraud would be a good thing to do as well.