Bidah@thelemmy.club to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 days agoWhat do you think about the concept of lesser evil? (i.e. when faced with selecting from two immoral options, the less immoral one should be chosen.)message-squaremessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down14
arrow-up154arrow-down1message-squareWhat do you think about the concept of lesser evil? (i.e. when faced with selecting from two immoral options, the less immoral one should be chosen.)Bidah@thelemmy.club to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squareℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoYour point remains unmade. If it was a defense of moral relativism, the arguments don’t support the conclusion. If it was something else, I’ve no idea what you’re trying to say.
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoOf course you don’t understand because I’m not using your approved lingo. I had a good laugh watching you go from trying to use plain language, and then jumping to ‘moral relativism.’
minus-squareℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoI’m sorry, did you need me to keep talking like you’re five?
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoLaughing harder now. You are unable to articulate your position without resorting to lingo, then try to cover up with a lame joke. You’ve proven my point twice. First that ‘the lesser evil’ is a valid option and then when you showed you were dependent on lingo to make your points. Let me know what part of that you fail to understand.
Your point remains unmade. If it was a defense of moral relativism, the arguments don’t support the conclusion. If it was something else, I’ve no idea what you’re trying to say.
Of course you don’t understand because I’m not using your approved lingo.
I had a good laugh watching you go from trying to use plain language, and then jumping to ‘moral relativism.’
I’m sorry, did you need me to keep talking like you’re five?
Laughing harder now.
You are unable to articulate your position without resorting to lingo, then try to cover up with a lame joke.
You’ve proven my point twice. First that ‘the lesser evil’ is a valid option and then when you showed you were dependent on lingo to make your points.
Let me know what part of that you fail to understand.