• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Over time, maintenance costs on machines tend to increase. They all have a practical limit on profitability, before that cost exceeds their contributive value. Then they need to be replaced.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      And if the machines are the ones building new parts, that, like many other things, goes out the window. They can even recycle and refurbish parts

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s pure science fiction. It will never happen. Training people to do various manual tasks is always cheaper than using robots. Automation involves dedicated, task-specific machinery that improves on existing (manual) methods. People are always there to fill in the gaps in what those machines are capable of. We provide that required versatility.

        Replacing people with people-shaped robots to do the exact same job that people do, is the opposite of efficiency. There is no improvement involved. It’s literally a lateral shift, with an enormous price tag attached to it.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          I don’t know what to tell you, other than it’s already happening. Once the first robot builds a second, it’s over. You can buy one that can physically do light tasks for $8k, this summer Amazon started using robots for deliveries and has been using them for packaging for longer

          It’s not science fiction, it’s now an engineering problem, one that is progressing quickly