• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nice for people that use it I suppose. I don’t see a use case for it (nor have I ever heard of anybody doing this) but I’ll definitely give it a spin.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can see myself using it occasionally for the same reason I do in the IDE, i.e. to easily look at two pages at the same time.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          yes, but that requires opening them, then resizing them and moving them to be beside each other; it’s possible, but not convenient

          By that logic we wouldn’t need tabbed browsing at all, I remember browsing without it on IE6. :P

              • paraphrand@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Well, it seems like splitting a tab into two is just two tabs: read: we can already have two or more tabs in all modern browsers. But “side by side tabs” describes what is actually happening.

                Honestly, this is a difficult one to name. Even though splitting a tab into two isn’t what’s going on, “split tabs” might be the best they can do. It’s just more evidence that this feature is a bit weird, and why it hasn’t been a feature in Firefox, Chrome and Safari yet. Difficult to name succinctly and correctly, and it basically starts doing window management inside of a browser window.

                Also, why stop at splitting the tab in half? Lets stack them too and have a quad view with a tab in each quadrant of the main tab.

                Edit: ohh, call them Subtabs. And put them in a tab next to normal tabs.