• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nice for people that use it I suppose. I don’t see a use case for it (nor have I ever heard of anybody doing this) but I’ll definitely give it a spin.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can see myself using it occasionally for the same reason I do in the IDE, i.e. to easily look at two pages at the same time.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          yes, but that requires opening them, then resizing them and moving them to be beside each other; it’s possible, but not convenient

          By that logic we wouldn’t need tabbed browsing at all, I remember browsing without it on IE6. :P

              • paraphrand@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Well, it seems like splitting a tab into two is just two tabs: read: we can already have two or more tabs in all modern browsers. But “side by side tabs” describes what is actually happening.

                Honestly, this is a difficult one to name. Even though splitting a tab into two isn’t what’s going on, “split tabs” might be the best they can do. It’s just more evidence that this feature is a bit weird, and why it hasn’t been a feature in Firefox, Chrome and Safari yet. Difficult to name succinctly and correctly, and it basically starts doing window management inside of a browser window.

                Also, why stop at splitting the tab in half? Lets stack them too and have a quad view with a tab in each quadrant of the main tab.

                Edit: ohh, call them Subtabs. And put them in a tab next to normal tabs.

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I really missed this when I switched from Konqueror to Firefox a long time ago. Nice to see it happening.

    • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      what a braindead take on many fronts. to start with, browsers have chrome that will take up space, especially if you use a vertical tab layout. Plus the UX can be made much simpler by including it in the browser.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, managing windows is difficult. That’s why Windows users usually prefer to maximize everything, and the platform does not really prioritize drag and drop. Dragging and dropping between maximized windows? Cringe.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s silly, there’s lots of stuff that a browser could do with split tabs that a window manager would not be responsible for supporting. Applying search to both tabs simultaneously, for example.

      Should Firefox get rid of tabs themselves? That could also be done by the window manager.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This sounds like a nice feature, especially if you’re using side tabs. Hope it doesn’t consume too much of their time though. We don’t always need new UI features in browsers. I’d rather they be spending the time supporting new CSS standards and such, but I do appreciate the hard work.