• faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Yeah, and there will always be a demand for temporary housing. Even if every person has property, tourists need places to stay, you’d need a place to stay if your house is leveled by a natural disaster, it doesn’t make sense to jump through all the hoops of property ownership if you just want to be closer to mom’s nursing home in her final months, etc.

    The problem isn’t filling that need, it’s making a profit off it.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      under capitalism, almost nothing happens without a profit. If you’re so sure the problem isn’t capitalism, please explain to me how exactly you’re imagining things should work.

      • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t know how you got ‘this person is pro-capitalism’ from me saying ‘profit is the problem’.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I said:

          The problem is the market, IMO, if not capitalism entirely

          but it seemed to me that you were disagreeing with my post when you said “the problem is making a profit off it.” I could have misunderstood, and you were agreeing?

            • jsomae@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              yes. Capitalism is the problem, not landlords per se. Under capitalism, I feel like it is more ethical to rent out a spare room in one’s house than it is to not rent it out.