• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Haha I thought that too. “The cabinets will be locked” is the weirdest part imo. As if people spend hundreds or thousands of dollars installing locks in their own home so they can keep potential nannies out of the snacks.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly I wouldn’t be that surprised if at least some people have done that. The richer people get, the more they hate the concept of sharing. These are the kind of people that would let food rot rather than give it away.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Sure but your comment was about it not happening and I’m saying that, weird or not, there’s a high chance at least a few people have done that or something similar.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Not sure why someone downvoted you. The mother of one of my classmates as a child was absolutely psychotic (still is) and she insisted on having locks on every cabinet, not just to keep out the nannies (though I think she paid premium prices for all of her nannies to be Harvard-educated), but to keep out the children, so they couldn’t snack without permission. All of her children got fucked socioemotionally from her insanity.

    • Localhorst86@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I read that as locking the cabinets to keep the kids out. So they won’t be able to grab candy or whatever.