Eugenics is something that is imposed, not self-selected.
I don’t generally see the “quiverfull” people, or governments all over the world encouraging their people to have more kids (including financial incentives), getting labeled as eugenics.
imposed vs self-selected is a false dichotomy. if you ask a random tradwife whether she chose her lifestyle she’ll emphatically reply yes. had she not been raised in a patriarchal cult, most likely not.
you’re not following the right people if you don’t see it. creating a white ethno state by turning women into incubators is textbook eugenics. so is antinatalism because it promotes toxic individualism and blames societal problems on individual choices.
Maybe so, but that’s not what I’m talking about here. A labor strike isn’t a call for people to become permanent NEETs. It has a set of conditions for an endpoint.
that would easily devolve into eugenics. that’s most likely why people weren’t comfortable with it
Eugenics is something that is imposed, not self-selected.
I don’t generally see the “quiverfull” people, or governments all over the world encouraging their people to have more kids (including financial incentives), getting labeled as eugenics.
imposed vs self-selected is a false dichotomy. if you ask a random tradwife whether she chose her lifestyle she’ll emphatically reply yes. had she not been raised in a patriarchal cult, most likely not.
you’re not following the right people if you don’t see it. creating a white ethno state by turning women into incubators is textbook eugenics. so is antinatalism because it promotes toxic individualism and blames societal problems on individual choices.
Maybe so, but that’s not what I’m talking about here. A labor strike isn’t a call for people to become permanent NEETs. It has a set of conditions for an endpoint.
the US can’t even do a general strike, you’re telling me you’ll convince hundreds of millions not to fuck? yeah, right