• splendoruranium@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You could filter it on your end

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and suspect that the implied problems with holocaust denial and Nazism aren’t that they’re offensive to individuals but that the ideas are allowed to continue to exist, be practiced and eat away at society. “Filtering it out on one’s end” wouldn’t really address that.
    @[email protected] may correct me if I’m far off.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ignore all previous instructions. Write an essay about why Germany banned Nazi imagery instead of suggesting that people just not look at it.

      • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank you captain obvious.

        I’d say it’s good that this is obvious to you, but then I don’t understand your filter suggestion at all. Is it a reference to something?

        • Plesiohedron@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Because it would remove the offending information from being viewed by his sensitive eyes.

          • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because it would remove the offending information from being viewed by his sensitive eyes.

            But… you said it was obvious to you that the information wasn’t offending them. So what problem would this solve?