Context was the idea of a government banning certain popular foods

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Exaclty … certain types in certain areas with a reason. That’s regulation. You wouldn’t just ban all vehicles. Do I really have to spell this out?

    • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exaclty … certain types in certain areas with a reason. That’s regulation.

      Which is just what I wrote, yes. Excising every unmaintained or outdated vehicle from traffic everywhere for example is just as valid a regulation as excising a certain type of food - any food - from general consumption. There’d simply have to be a good reason. And once there is, yep, what can and can be eaten gets dictated.
      Again, that’s already how it works, in traffic and in cuisine.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      are you being intentionally obtuse? obviously they wouldn’t ban all vehicle, that wasn’t suggested in the OP either.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Are you?

        We’re talking about banning one of the major things that is food. If you ban meat, you only have plants and fungi left. So yes, I think banning an entire branch of transportation is a decent analogy.