• diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just like “liberty”, “fascism”, “freedom”, “bigotry”, “woke”, “liberal”, “communist”, “nazi”, “supremacist”, “ethical”, “feminism”, “gender” and many others.

      It’s easier to push a political agenda if you empty words of all meaning just to turn them into buzzwords that can mean whatever you want them to be in order to trigger outrage

    • small44@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, because lot of people try to avoid complains about censorship by naming it other names

      • Ducks@ducks.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because this is not censorship. You’re free to browse any defederated community. You’re not censored, they’re not censored. All the content is perfectly viewable on the fediverse.

        Go join another instance. You can’t enter somebody else’s house and complain about how they don’t want to invite the neighbor over as well. That’s not censorship. Go to the neighbors house if you want to hang out with them.

        But you’ve been explained this multiple times, so I’ll leave it at this. Ignorance is not bliss.