- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Strange how so many, are so quick to anger towards Firefox. I have used it since Navigator, and I’ve always felt quite safe with it. I am in awe of a browser that not only competes, but also surpasses other browsers with a ton more money behind it.
And this is… good?
so they’re getting rid of mercurial and self hosting? not sure if this is positive…
Generally thats concerning.
But hopefully this means its easier to find and submit bug reports. Their issue tracker beforewm was a terrible UX.
It is still an improvement as this makes it easier to bring in more people.
With that being said, I think it would’ve been better to use Forgejo.
And this is how you make a meme, fellow kids!
Real question, why downgrade to a proprietary host?
My guess is they’re preparing for the Google search money to vanish and cutting costs wherever they can however small and hosting their own code repo was one thing to go.
Hosting the code is probably non-material as far as costs go for Mozilla, and I doubt they would ever recoup the costs of migrating the code off their current solution in terms of engineering costs.
If I had to guess, this is them meeting other Open Source contributors where they usually are, which in large part is GitHub these days.
If I had to guess, this is them meeting other Open Source contributors where they usually are, which in large part is GitHub these days.
Out of 28 projects whose release note RSS-feed I subscribe to, 25 of them are hosted on GitHub. While I’d love to see more of these projects move away from GitHub, it is understandable that they go where the largest amount of devs are. I’d love to see more of them start mirroring their repositories to Codeberg or their own Forgejo instance though, to give developers the opportunity to contribute while not alienating the devs who stay on GitHub. At least that would lessen the loss of opportunities for the devs when ditching GitHub - but I am not sure whether it is trivial or a hassle to maintain that kind of setup.
That would seem a bit extreme, I was thinking more that they want to lower the barrier to contributions, but who knows, it could be. Both would positively affect the economical aspect of things after all
RIP
Didn’t they move to Microsoft for hosting quite some time ago?
they only had this mirror
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/
but it seems they were using mercurial at https://hg-edge.mozilla.org/
