• 10A@kbin.social
    0·
    1 year ago

    Except really, nobody’s ever debating anyone’s right to exist. That’s absurd.

    Consider this: If a mass murderer was captured and imprisoned, he could claim that the justice system opposes his right to exist. The trouble with that is he’d be completely incorrect. The justice system opposes his behavior of murder. No matter how much he believes his very existence is inextricably bound to his behavior of murder, the reality is he murders by choice, and it is that intentional action which the justice system opposes.

      • 10A@kbin.social
        0·
        1 year ago

        Sure, and I could have chosen any other action, but I chose murder because it’s not contentious to express a disapproval of it.

        • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
          0·
          1 year ago

          Did it ever occur to you that it’s “contentious” to express “disapproval” of trans people existing because…there’s nothing WRONG with trans people existing?

          • 10A@kbin.social
            0·
            1 year ago

            Hmm, sounds like you missed my entire point. Nobody objects to any people existing. Some people object to particular behaviors.

            • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
              1·
              1 year ago

              You don’t think trans people exist and that being trans is “a behavior” equivalent with murder.

              I definitely understood the “point” of your bigotry perfectly well.