Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don’t like.

      Unlike you, I don’t chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.

      You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you’re confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Whatever your reason for doubting CSIS is, dont attributed to me. You have plenty on your plate as it is without making up claims by others.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not the one doubting CSIS who made the report that China’s gallium restriction are a national security threat to US.