from the the-real-agenda dept

  • Fusty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    17 days ago

    Wikipedia is a collection of random statements, I don’t go to that side. Wikipedia does not accuratly ddscribe the things that I’m against, and it does not properly explain the things that I support.

    • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      What a reductive way to look at information. I could send you all of the sourced links at the bottom of the page but then you’d come up with another excuse to not read anything and just complain.

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      What do you mean? I usually find Wikipedia’s explanations quite helpful. Maybe a little heady at times, but always factual.