• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I disagree with Grue about Libertarianism, and also with you about the relation of the terms. Liberalism’s definition is an ideology of personal freedoms and civil rights.

    While that can be interpreted as deregulatory conservative by some, it is primarily a nonviolent ideology that protects disenfranchised.

    Thats why its always so shocking to me to see tankies and anarchist thrashing Liberals on Lemmy. It’s literally an ideology where people are treated fairly and equally. If they spoke out about specific Liberal Parties then I could hop onboard because those usually suck.

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You seem to have the truest take. It just boils down emancipation. Leftist policies are liberal in nature, seeking freedom from the hierarchy of capitalism.

      Most of the confusion seems to come from neoliberalism or market liberalism co-opting the term for conservative and authoritarian uses and now everyone is confused.

      Leftists who need a distinction in the terms seem to fall into two categories; those who see liberals as reformists instead of revolutionaries (too moderate), and the false leftism of Lenin/Stalin etc sects who aim for an authoritarian model but without capitalism.