• sergih123@eslemmy.es
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It ain’t that hard,

    High density places:

    lower parking availability, increase public transport availability and frequency.

    Low density places:

    They need their cars, they can keep them.

    Remove zoning restrictions, and parking requirements

    so there is more mixture of commercial and residential places shortening transport distance, allowing for even avoiding public transport and just walking/biking replacing this.

    More biking infraestructure.

    Fair taxes to car owners,

    that means, othe people not having to support the huge car projects that cost more than they can get from the taxes they do on cars.

    Also regulations on environmental design of cars, basically gaining back the progress we had done on car efficiency that was taken back by everyone wanting an SUV instead of a turismo.

    :)

        • traveler01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry but you’re just passing the same leftist propaganda, that all would be fixed if you took the cars from people. Cars are a fundamental part of freedom of movement and taking them shouldn’t and isn’t the solution for anything at all.

          High density zones are just symptom of the city being overcrowded, and for that there’s really no solution. Public transportation, biking lanes, should existing should be the rule, not a bandaid for the fact that the city you live is overcrowded or its design is utter garbage.

        • traveler01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

          Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

          All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

        • traveler01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

          Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

          All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

        • traveler01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

          Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

          All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

        • traveler01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

          Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

          All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

        • traveler01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

          Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

          All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.