• Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I like her and I get why creatives are panicking because of all the AI hype.

    However:

    In evidence for the suit against OpenAI, the plaintiffs claim ChatGPT violates copyright law by producing a “derivative” version of copyrighted work when prompted to summarize the source.

    A summary is not a copyright infringement. If there is a case for fair-use it’s a summary.

    The comic’s suit questions if AI models can function without training themselves on protected works.

    A language model does not need to be trained on the text it is supposed to summarize. She clearly does not know what she is talking about.

    IANAL though.