• huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you want devs to make apps without any monetization you’re limiting the number of devs that will develop for your platform.

    Free only means you only allow passion projects that people work on as a side project or only the developers rich enough to have retired already.

    Nobody who is struggling to get by can spend all their time developing a free app that has 0 monetization.

    So they monetize on Google Play.

    If you care about breaking Google’s control of Android you should cheer on another paid marketplace, especially one out of the clutches of Amazon.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you want devs to make apps without any monetization you’re limiting the number of devs that will develop for your platform.

      So?

      The point of fdroid is not to have evil pieces of shit injecting their apps with spyware and ads.

      • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Developers deserve to be paid for their time though…

        Sure for many it’s nothing but a hobby and they’re happy to create something for free. But that doesn’t mean every developer needs to do the same.

        And yes ads are a privacy nightmare and putting them into your app is bad. So either you only use apps from hobbyists or you pay for access (whether that be a set price for a finished product or a subscription for a service).

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Paid apps are fine. I’m generally not OK with in-app purchases, because the overwhelmingly majority of them are abusive microtransactions.

          Allowing ads is not OK. Privacy is a massive issue, but even without privacy concerns all ads are malicious.

        • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Developers deserve to be paid for their time though…

          If I buy you a free drink at a bar, say “hey do you want this?”, and you accept, do I then “deserve” to be able to follow you home afterwards and know where you live?

          At the end of the day nobody held a gun to anybody’s head and forced them to develop an application, and especially nobody then forced them to give that application away for free.

          EDIT: Likewise I don’t think developers of such free (as in beer) software owe their users anything beyond the basic expectation that their software isn’t malware.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      F-Droid is literally just a repository. Linux manages it just fine to have repo driven “store” apps.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cryptomator is available on F-Droid but you still have to purchase a license to use it, although the dev has to maintain all the licensing and payment infrastructure which can be a roadblock for some.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Free means freedom not cost.

      The problem with online payments is that they compromise privacy and require use of proprietary software and centralized servers