I don’t mean doctor-making-150k-a-year rich, I mean properly rich with millions to billions of dollars.

I think many will say yes, they can be, though it may be rare. I was tempted to. I thought more about it and I wondered, are you really a good person if you’re hoarding enough money you and your family couldn’t spend in 10 lifetimes?

I thought, if you’re a good person, you wouldn’t be rich. And if you’re properly rich you’re probably not a good person.

I don’t know if it’s fair or naive to say, but that’s what I thought. Whether it’s what I believe requires more thought.

There are a handful of ex-millionaires who are no longer millionaires because they cared for others in a way they couldn’t care for themselves. Only a handful of course, I would say they are good people.

And in order to stay rich, you have to play your role and participate in a society that oppresses the poor which in turn maintains your wealth. Are you really still capable of being a good person?

Very curious about people’s thoughts on this.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    idk, you probably have a small number of artists and genuinely lucky-sons-of-bitches who get proper rich without being bad people. Or at least with their wealth not coming from being a bad person.

    • Anomandaris@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, fair enough, I’m not too arrogant to admit there are exceptions to every rule.

      And more power to artists and exotic chefs and others, who are able to get sociopath billionaires to fork out crazy amounts of money for their work.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They still benefit from regime in place to maintain their wealth and many are by default daddy’s lap dogs.

      People love putting up singers or athletes as they earned their money “fair” etc but these people end shilling for the benefit of the same rich daddies

      Their art literally supports the status quo.

      For example NBA players and China, rappers shilling “prosperity rap” and many singers putting out generic catchy music. Wouldn’t want to bite the hand that feeds them, ay?

      They mostly never take a stand but to be fair those that do get punished and removed from public eye.

      George Carlin was an OG about it, said shit that was so true when most of us were still shitting diapers.

      You can turn any of his content on today. 100% on point and relavent. It is a bit uncanny.

      I am sure he made good money but at least he didn’t lie about how it works. Most celebs are more worried about other celebs accepting them into rich daddy club… Not their audiences

    • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think I can 100% get behind the direct link that being an artist makes you a virtuous person, though I understand your bigger point.

      I think we are overlooking tremendously how the art world is often a method in which the ultra wealthy wash their money. I don’t think that artists that rise to the level of success of becoming a household name are blind to this.