Only the cone-magnet-coil-wires part is the same. All the electrical parts are different. There’s no way.

Inflation will take care of that. Memory never really dropped in dollar price.

Lower temperature is not necessarily better quality. At 0 it will get very repetitive, it’s for classification tasks, not for prose.

I suppose the optimal temperature depends on the model and the task, and I don’t think it’s very sensitive. Varying temp might even give better results, who knows.

By being just a little weird, but in a pattern, and not to you. A pattern like: every n tokens raise the temperature (randomness) for one token. Then to dectect AI, you tokenize and calculate how expected each next token is. Then you try fitting the pattern to that.

Is it webscrapers?

deleted by creator

Supposedly the people paid to rate responses are already using AI

The message is clear without knowing the reference though

I don’t know whether I agree with all of these, but the list is probably longer and there will be many good ideas. That doesn’t mean total nonprivacy is possible, or a good idea.

The best ideas in your list are probably more about transparency in low-trust environments, rather than personal privacy.

Yeah but we’re talking about your idea now.

We don’t need to reach utopia, but the supposed benefits of total nonprivacy only come when it’s total. Then it’ll never happen, as long as someone benefits from hiding.

Econ 101 is about the benefits af free market. All the classes after are about why it can’t be achieved and how to deal with that.

That’s not an ideology, that’s a dream. It’s trivially true, but it doesn’t apply to the real world. Nothing you do can bring reality closer to that, and you’ll just open yourself to harm.

LLM is fine to say, not more awkward than element. And it is AI.

And I wish we’d call phones computers. It’s been very profitable for corps for people to not realize that they are.

Don’t forget the AI bubble is also a ram and SSD bubble.

Not in a “Darwinian moment”, like the CEO says. Then healthy social structures can be decisive.

Survival of the fittest is about species, not individuals. He’s saying AI is a threat to the human race.

Except it is a fairly good artifice of grass.

Good for what? Looking at? It’s not gonna satisfy a goat.

We only care for the look (“the output”), and we don’t expect more of it, or sell it for more than it is. That’s why it’s not a controversial term for astroturf. It wasn’t controversial for AI either until very recently. In 60 years of AI nobody has split hairs over output of intelligence. It’s justified but weirdly misdirected anger.

AI is a perfectly cromulent word for the thing.

Do you question the grass part of artificial grass? It’s obviously not grass.

Imho nothing wrong with AI use by professionals, as long as it’s verified. That obviously wasn’t the case.

BBQ your own scrolls

All AI is actual AI. It doesn’t need to be real intelligence to be artificial, should be obvious. Are you telling me artificial grass shouldn’t be called that because a goat can’t eat it?