• midimalist@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, because I need Adobe to do my meh wage part-time job in developing country from my one and only working laptop and I don’t have the luxury of surplus money, time, and mental energy to do anything about it.

      But I get your point. If I have the means, I will fix my broken Thinkpad and definitely install Linux there the first chance I get. Either that or Adobe finally release Linux version, which will probably be released after Half-Life 3.

      I can’t wait to try Endeavor (so I can finally be an obnoxious person who say “I used Arch-based distro, btw”)

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Adobe products barely work correctly on Windows, I wouldn’t want to try to run them in an environment that was even less supported

    • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most people believe they will start seeing problems where there were none before. They need to invest time into research about their use-cases, which is a cost even before switching.

      The typical user used Windows since before they became scared of change, so that’s what they’ll stick with.

      The pain of using Windows still can and will be higher without the majority of people switching to anything.

      • asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The typical user used Windows since before they became scared of change, so that’s what they’ll stick with.

        In some ways this was me, then win 11 came around and I really didn’t like it, and it was pretty unstable for me, so I was stuck between two options for change, neither being what I would call “comfortable” (I had to, win 10 was blue screening literally every other day) which was when I saw the steam deck announcement, (also the LTT Linux Challenge) and I haven’t given win 11 a serious try sense

        • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t want to point fingers/cast shade or anything. Hell, I myself resist change where I can.

          It costs incredible amounts of energy and time to change, and that change might even be counter productive to some or most of the things you do.

          Gratulations on starting Linux, I hope it does everything you need it to do. Even if you should end up using it only for a short amount of time, I hope the experience enriches you.

    • jsonjson@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used to help maintain a Linux distro, and there is a level of polish Windows has that I feel cannot be reached by the FOSS ecosystem due the resources dumped into hiring dedicated teams at MS. Microsoft has tons of money. I’m sad about the direction of windows, but it generally works pretty well for how it’s designed (which is in some cases awful).

          • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Sure. I could accept hearing “Windows is more polished than most Linux distro’s”. But to say blankly that Windows is polished is crazy talk. It’s jank as balls. Its got like 3 totally discrete and independent UI frameworks for the menus operating in parallel, and somehow none of them provide all the functionality you would need, have to mix and match them.

            That’s just a single example. I could rant for hours.

      • c0ber@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        there was a time where that may have been the case, but microsoft has been chipping away at any polish they had for years. sure there’s still some rough edges in linux, but it’s only getting better where windows continues to get worse

  • undefined@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s so weird to me that Lemmy is full of anti-Windows, anti-Google posts but the comments are always “I’m thinking about switching.”

    How about… just do it?

    I don’t know what I’m trying to say but being 20 years into “Windows-free” a few years of “Google-free” it’s tiring. I know everyone isn’t me but it’s tough watching this from the other side.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Getting rid of Google would require switching phone for me as there isn’t a google free ROM for the Redmi K50 Pro.

      • Time@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        GrapheneOS for the Google Pixel. I’m using a Google Pixel 4 which was like $120 and super easy to flash. I’m from the US, so I understand if things might be different where you are.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That would be a hilariously bad downgrade. I could probably afford to replace mine with a Google Pixel 6, but that would still be a significant downgrade (90Hz screen). After having two phones at 120Hz, I won’t go lower.

          • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            25% reduction in refresh rate to only 4x the historical standard that most humans alive grew up with balanced against any semblance of privacy seems like an easy win…

  • Lung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just got a new laptop and was genuinely gonna try windows 11 and wsl for my coding needs. But in first boot, it demands internet to do updates. Ok, I connect to coffee shop wifi. Nope, won’t do it because it can’t handle the click through screen to accept wifi ToS. Fine. I take it home, where my Internet is great but has a glitch where it drops out for a few seconds now and then. Turns out that windows will literally cancel updating and demand I reconnect and restart for the kind of drop that I barely notice day to day. So I gave up, plugged in my ArchLinux thumb drive, and mkfs.ext4 before rsyncing my entire old computer to it

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In Linux I wanted a window to open in a specific place on boot. Fairly simple bash script.

    In Windows FUCK YOU.

    With llm’s you can get a lot of bad info but for Linux commands, basic tutorials and scripting Linux is WAY easier to learn nowadays.

    Edit didn’t mean to imply Linux is easier than Windows to learn in general.

    • Alborlin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      In atleast 3 distros I wanted to add program at start-up, easy peasy on windows , Linux is mess , some has gui for that but these three distorsion HAD ZERO option for it and I still don’t know how to do it.

      In windows i want to serch for here is program installed, so easy to know and find . In Linux I had to fight multiple terminal commands ( in 2024 no less) and ev n then indid not come across whwre is the program installed

      In Linux I plugged in hdd and wanted a program to acess its content, turns out I can’t do that without mumbo jumbo or wv n with it Whwre as in windows , inplug it and VOILA! I can access it across anything.

      Linux MAY be good at something , but it still sucks for real Common usage.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point, I have lost count of the number of times that I’ve left my perfectly working Windows computer at the end of my work day, only to return to a completely broken computer that won’t boot the next morning.

    I find this to either be a lie or self inflicted. I manage a small fleet of a few hundred windows systems and all updates have been fine for years.

    In the windows admin user groups there are more than a few that are deploying updates within 24hrs of release to thousands of servers and workstations and have not reported issues.

    Lastly I think that tech bloggers say things like this to get clicks, so they can get ad revenue. Then they also tell you how to disable updates so they can get more clicks and ad revenue.

    It’s disingenuous and probably harmful to be telling people to disable updates that lead them to be exposed to vulnerabilities.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I‘ve had several faulty Windows updates in recent years and my machine is pre-built. And going by the threads I sifted through in search of solutions I am far from the only one. It‘s perfectly fine to not have the newest update at all times so as long as you update once a month when you can afford a potential faulty update. Having an older than most recent version is far from your biggest concern regarding security. I would even say it‘s a non-issue compared to good old fishing mails.

    • Ace! _SL/S@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t even need updates, in the 10 years I was on Windows it didn’t want to start after shutting it down again like 7 times

      I hated having to reinstall every year

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hate Windows for all the monetisation and privacy issues but I never really had problems with it killing my computer.

      • Jay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My biggest issue with Windows (at least on my desktop) is with my GPU driver for my Intel Arc A770 LE. Windows Update will not stop automatically “updating” my driver to a driver that was made about a year and a half ago. It’s too old that Intel Arc Control doesn’t even work with it. It doesn’t matter how I install the latest driver from Intel, I can DDU the old one, install the driver and wipe all custom configurations or just install it normally. Nothing works, upon the next reboot, it automatically says “there’s an update” and installs regardless if I want it or not. The driver installation also has a 50/50 chance of blue screening my whole system when installing, both the installation from Windows update, and from Intel. The Window driver “updates” for my driver have also just happened randomly with no notice, they’ve occurred during hour long Blender renders, crashing it and wasting hours of my time redoing work. (This is all on Windows 10). It is frustrating to deal with

        Meanwhile, my Linux install on the same computer just runs mesa and I’ve had no issues at all with my GPU. (Or any issues with drivers really, it all just works).

        Although it didn’t “kill” my computer. Whenever I still used Windows, it would spontaneously install this outdated driver which would either blue screen or crash whatever I was in the middle of doing such as working in Blender, playing a game, etc.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I find this to either be a lie or self inflicted.

      “I’ve never experienced what you describe, so it must be either imagined or your own fault.”

      I’ve seen this nonsense over and over again in communities of all kinds, most often in tech forums (where there are always a few participants suffering from a big-fish-little-pond effect). It’s a very rude and foolish bit of human behavior.

      There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My two cents, I could say the same as the author. My Windows work laptop most of the times cannot wake up from sleep (you know, opening the lid after it’s closed) so I have to force a restart. There’s a 50% or less chance that Bluetooth and WiFi won’t work at all (they won’t be displayed on Windows, like it’s not even a feature) after I turn the laptop on, so most of my pre-work morning is restarting the laptop until it’s working as intended. It’s the third laptop I got from them, they’re different models but they’re all HP, and they all had problems. The Macs and the same HP laptops running Linux have none of these issues.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can kind of feel the author on this. I’m in charge of a lot of “special projects” at work that basically come down to, “figure out a way to replicate this extremely expensive technology or software using low cost or free alternatives”. It ends up being an unholy mix of programs and hardware that is held together with duct tape and super glue and any minor perturbation means something breaks.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sounds like less of a Windows problem than an individual problem, though.

        Blaming Windows cause your Frankenstein machine breaks often is disingenuous.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously, anytime people make complaints like these about windows, it just tells me they are either

      1. Tweaking their system in ways far beyond what the OS is designed for (which is fine, but then don’t blame Microsoft when updates break your system)
      2. Doesn’t know how to use a computer
      3. Knows how to use a computer but is willfully ignorant so they can rant at MS and get clicks
      4. Incredibly unlucky and not representative of the general population
      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        #1 is by and far the cause I see when people ask me ‘why did thing break?!’

        There’s a lot of ‘Well, I edited the registry and then deleted these two files and installed this 3rd party software so that it looks like it did in Windows XP!’ floating in my circles, which almost entirely correlates to the people who are mad that their install is, yet again, broken/not working as expected/having weird problems.

        Of course, people are doing this because Microsoft can’t stop shitting up Windows in a way that annoys people, and thus leading them to do things that maybe aren’t the best idea.

        So, in summary: it’s a land of contrasts, but stop adding bullshit nobody wants Microsoft.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tweaking their system in ways far beyond what the OS is designed for

        That’s the issue: the way microshit is taking windows is not acceptable for an increasing number of people.

        Why would I allow Satya the creep to control my PC that I paid money for.

        Also, why are they putting ads into it.

        Updates rolling back privacy settings, although this stopped now.

        Forced online accounts.

        At what point is it too much for you? I bet over next few years microshit will get to you too lol

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          While I agree with most of what you’re saying, it’s also stupid to blame Microsoft for breaking your computer if you forcefully uninstall the Windows store, despite the fact that it’s needed for parts of certain updates.

          A lot of the “debloaters” have no fucking idea what they’re actually doing and are uninstalling/disabling critical parts of the OS so the task manager shows less RAM usage (because God forbid you actually use your damn RAM).

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah they just need to accept their fate and join Linux.

            At some point, fucking with Windows is more time and you have to be always doing it.

            Linux you have set it up but after that it just works

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s kind of disingenuous of you to proudly say, “I don’t use the same version of Windows that this person likely does and I don’t have the same issues that this person does so they must be full of shit”.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There aren’t many versions of windows since 10 and 2016. They are all very similar now.

        • bizarroland@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are vast differences between Windows home and Windows pro and Windows Enterprise editions as far as how easy it is to control and block off the annoyance ware that Microsoft builds into it.

          If you use deployment software to roll out your images after standardizing them and have a set image that you can deploy to a thousand computers as easily as one then it’s very simple to sign in with a local domain account and disable the windows things through a group policy and just start rocking and rolling whereas your average Windows home user is not going to even have access to GPO and we’ll have to tediously for each and every single computer every single time they reset it redo all of the things to disable all of Microsoft’s crap activation.

          They are not entirely different but definitely distinct versions of Windows and dismissing the home and non-enterprise users that their experience is inferior to your experience on the Enterprise side is what I’m saying is disingenuous

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s kind of a wide disparity for something that’s so locked down, though. It’s not as though one person is saying they get occasional issues and the other is they often have issues… it’s one person basically saying their own personal computer is nigh unusable and the other providing an example of a large number of examples of that being extremely unlikely…

        It’s far more likely this individual is fucking up their computer on a regular basis, or has a very high bar of usability that is broken any time there is even the slightest hiccup or inconvenience.