• nodsocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait a year and your $1000 $650 Pixel 8 Pro will look like an even cheaper camera.

    • Starayo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I use their OBS version since I had a few issues with OBS and the normal one. My cat likes to sleep on my computer and I needed another camera to point at her when streaming… And then I realised I didn’t need to buy one because I had old phones with good cameras in my desk drawer. Just got a cheap mount to hold my old xiaomi mi 9 SE. Looks fantastic, works well.

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this site cancer on Mobile? Or is that just me? I get highjacking ads that take me elsewhere and can’t return to the site

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No ads for me personally, but I’m running ublock. Could you share a screenshot?

      • criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol I tried to take a video but the ad didn’t appear. It was one of those fake “you were randomly selected to win $xxx” and the other was a fake antivirus scan

        • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re probably actually one of those randomly selected winners where it actually mattered and counted but you thought it was just some shitty ad or scam… You should have clicked it…

          • limerod@reddthat.comM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, if he had clicked. He would’ve won the iPhone 16 Pro max! Wasted opportunity, such a shame.

  • rustyredox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It feels like we’re finally, and thankfully, coming full circle. I remember buying my first digital camera in the early 2000s, specifically chosen because it was one of the many that included USB web camera functionality. Aside from downloading the photos on its internal storage, external storage was optional, you could also use the included software to serve as a webcam source.

    I can’t remember if it included a microphone, I’m thinking it didn’t. It also ran off on those small stubby film camera batteries, and not off USB power from the cable you connected it to, which was kind of dumb, and made it expensive to use as a webcam. The video quality must have been something around 140p, and any kind of conference call software was garbage back then as well. Yet the premise of a single device having multi-use features was such a no-brainer, given you already had have the PC USB integration to use it as a point and shoot digital camera.

    Modern smart phones have such excellent cameras, it felt really odd that you had to use a lot of hacky work arounds and reencoding over network streams to emulate the same functionality that some of the first affordable digital cameras on the market had decades prior. I spend some time looking into weather a custom Linux kernel could be used with Android to emulate the standard USB profile of a UVC camera device, but it’s really nice to hear that this kind of functionality is being pushed through Android mainstream development.

    https://github.com/tejado/android-usb-gadget

    Guess it only took a pandemic and Apple to showcase the same functionality to spur the core Android development into gear to match feature parity.