• wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The question is if there’s anything left of the original blizzard to benefit from their newfound autonomy

  • echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one is that stupid. This is mire lies, he knows they’ll be absorbed like the rest

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno, between redfall and Starfield it sure does feel like Microsoft leaves them to their own devices and doesn’t even check their homework.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bethesda was (very) recently folded into microsoft proper, it was operating as it’s own thing for the first few years, like every company microsoft purchases. then gets folded in.

        • Kushan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not quite, they promoted some folks and reorged the upper structure of Xbox a bit but Zenimax is still operating fairly independently:

          “ZeniMax will continue to operate as a limited integration entity led by Jamie Leder, President and CEO, reporting to Matt,”

          https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/26/23933049/microsoft-reorg-xbox-marketing-ai-leadership-changes

          Clearly Microsoft is trying to avoid more bad game launches, they need to exert some amount of control but I’m looking at that and seeing them trying to do it with a minimal touch.

          Microsoft has had a spat of sub-par, underwhelming releases lately - Redfall, Starfield, even going back as far as Halo Infinite and to my knowledge, none of the war stories there have said it had anything to do with Microsoft meddling. I’d go as far as to say that Microsoft needed to keep a closer finger on the pulse of all these studios, not less.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They aren’t, that’s all business speak to avoid bad press. Microsoft do this a lot.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which game companies has Microsoft absorbed? My understanding was they’ve left most of their game acquisitions alone to do their own thing

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_Game_Studios#Subsidiaries_and_divisions everything under Xbox Game Studios, Zenimax is currently in the process of being moved under Xbox Game Studios (or, rather, studios under the Zenimax name are, zenimax will cease to exist once that is complete)

        Everyone has been absorbed. I don’t know where you got that understanding from, they absolutely are not left to do their own thing.

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re referring to their legal structure, which is not the point under discussion. Thus far, Microsoft has seemed very willing to give their game studio acquisitions significant autonomy even in high level operational decisions. Minecraft is the most famous example, but there are others

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      MS is often criticized for being held off. You can ask anyone who had worked with them and not often than not you’ll find they let people do what they want.

  • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they wanted to be optimistic about a more independent future, they shouldn’t have thrown the seal of quality of their brand name for a quick buck.