cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/39351554

Samtime tries out a Fairphone 6 running Ubuntu Touch and it seemed pretty fine. Noted issues were the second camera not working, GPS/Map app being a bit weird, and imo, the screen showing all the apps you have open is terrible. But with the reg app store and waydroid, I think it could be almost managable to use.

My mom is a battery life fiend though, so that part she won’t let go of. What’s your thoughts?

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Kinda unrelated but I do have a PinePhone a mate gave me a while back; no matter what OS you use on it it’s sooo slow. Weirdly, the Android port actually seemed the most usable…

    Now, I realise that the PinePhone isn’t exactly a phone you’re meant to daily drive, but even then the performance is terrrible.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    it could be almost managable to use.

    That was my take away last time I tried Sailfish OS. It mostly worked but there were some issues that were just too hard to ignore. For me the problem with a phone is that it’s for short but very frequent interactions. When there’s friction it becomes very annoying very fast. I don’t want it to almost do everything, I need to do very specific things well.

  • Matty_r@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No idea who this guy is, but that was a hilarious video. Heaps of little jabs to highlight some of the very real weirdness of it all, but a decent enough demo to show that it all does intact work.

    • Pzulu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      All of his videos are like that.

      The one that sticks with me is Apple Glarse, his renaming of their Glass UI design.

  • Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    A shame Fairphone doesn’t have a headphone jack. IMO that contradicts the sustainability aspect of the phone

    • exaybachae@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Just connect USB-C headphones, or use a USB-C to 3.5mm audio dongle.

      The audio jack isn’t needed anymore. The only real downsides of USB-C are that you can’t charge while listening, less wirelessly, and it’s more wear and tear for the port, but that’s unlikely to matter.

      • innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I have owned one phone without an audio jack. Never again. Don’t shove that trash non logic down anybody else’s throat there’s no reason not to have a 3.5mm aux. USBC aux cords are the least reliable cables I’ve ever seen on the market and their adapters are just as shitty. U know what works? Every single time? Aux port.

      • yellow [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just connect USB-C headphones

        Not everyone happens to have a pair lying around, and this doesn’t really work for IEMs and the like.

        or use a USB-C to 3.5mm audio dongle.

        I’ve yet to find a dongle that lasts more than around half a year of frequent use before starting to break. If you have any recommendations, that would be greatly appreciated.

          • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Will sound better too. A cheap FIIO or even Apple dongle sounds noticeably better, more power delivered.

            I’m ok without the jack I think unless they’re going to also pair it with a high quality internal DAC like Sony.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have a OnePlus Nord N10 5G I picked up to play with Ubuntu Touch.

    Now that VoLTE works I can actually make and receive calls which makes it nearly usable.

    I wish RCS could work but that may be out of their hands. Group texts (MMS) don’t work either unfortunately.

    It’s close to usable but still not ready for me personally.

    I did contribute to Ubuntu Touch though by adding Colemak keyboard layout support and they accepted my pull request :D

    • BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Nice. Similar, I got the N100 off the bay to give a try. VoLTE now works good in USA with Tello /Tmobile, at least in my area, that was certainly a show stopper for some time, huge win!

      Got OpenVPN working, uWolf runnng my NextDNS so can filter/watch the logs, MMS has some issues (only works with wifi disabled, but I think they have a fix coming), no RCS as you mention.

      As you say, not quite there, but good progress overall. Hope for continued progress, and love to see the many more posts on it than ever before!

      Using a privacy focused Android phone project for now, but long term the real answer is Linux or some other new project to tear away completely from Bigtechs dependency & stranglehold. Thanks for your adding development to the cause!

    • Solrac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      RCS has no documentation on how to be implemented… Thank you for the contribution btw

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Cool! I’ve got the N100, and experience is similar. I’m trying to build up some motivation to use it daily for a while.

      Good on you for the development work, and congrats on you accepted pull!

  • linule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They need funding. Some people, countries and unions have an increased interest in tech independence.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s not just a tech issue. Funding tech dev is great, but there is a political problem.

      We need to vote for politicians who get the need for competition and will fight vendor lockin. Who will ensure things that are needed to do stuff isn’t done only for the duopoly.

      We need to support groups fighting bad politicians and getting into media to inform normal people. Who make legal fights. EFF, OpenRghtGroup, etc.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      For anyone reading thus, please consider donating to PostmarketOS or Mobian if you have the means, as it will help us escape the Android ecosystem which is getting more and more anti-user due to google controlling it.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The problem with PostmarketOS is that it only is stable on extremely old phones that sometimes aren’t even midrange.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It is certainly not usable for the average person in it’s current state, hence why I suggest donating to it to help with developing it.

          With proper funding and full-time devs, it would be able to focus on adding proper support to more phones, or potentially partner with a manufacturer like GrapheneOS just did with Motorola to get first-class support on a smaller handful of devices.

          Postmarket is our only long-term mobile option that will remain FLOSS and in the users best interest, we just have to support it and help build it up into something we can all use :)

          • Lumisal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I have donated and even used it. On said old phones, it works decently well.

            The issue is the hardware support, since most people won’t want a near decade old phone who’s battery you probably need to replace but can’t do so easily.

            Feels like they need to rally behind a more modern phone and polish that to get people to actually try it rather than fractured development. The Fairphone 4, which they already have a stable release on, would be a good candidate.

            Ah well, I’ll still keep up my donations anyway. Just feels like they could have more focused leadership, similar to the Linux Kernel.

            I also recommend (if you’re in Europe) petitioning government bodies to help fund them as well.

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What’s the pitch here? Initial impression is that it makes the ecosystem fragmented, as now (along with Ubuntu Touch), people have at least 3 different projects to fund. There needs to be a core standard that unifies the efforts and funding.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The issue with Ubuntu Touch is that unfortunately it’s not a genuine alternative to Android, as it actually relies on Android quite a lot to function as well as it does.

          It generally uses an outdated Android kernel (which is also usually not receiving security updates) and a Halium abstraction layer to access the closed source binary blob Android drivers for the phone’s hardware. It also requires that it be installed on top of an existing Android install, so in all it’s more of Linuxified layer on top of Android, which means it’s not truly escaping the control of the Android/Google ecosystem.

          PostmarketOS and Mobian are genuinely Mobile focused Linux distros that run the mainline up-to-date Linux kernel, right on the bare metal, meaning they are not subject to any influence from Google.

          Both projects often collaborate and benefit from each other, they just use a different base distro (Alpine for PostmarketOS, Debian for Mobian), but that doesn’t result in any wasted effort, as ultimately any new developments, drivers, or new phone support are mainlined into the kernel itself, so both projects benefit.

          They’re not as usable as Ubuntu Touch is right now, but they are ultimately the better solutions long-term to ensure that all the code is under community control so we aren’t reliant on outdated unsecure Android components.

          • linule@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Very interesting and informative, thanks for explaining. My understanding was that UT just conveniently copied/reused some hardware interfacing components from Android, since Android uses a Linux kernel too and why reinvent the wheel, especially with the plethora of phone manufacturers available, which you really don’t want to do again. But I didn’t know about it using Android kernel, or needing an existing Android install, which sound indeed problematic.

            I still think that it is important to standarize a canonical Linux core, or something like that, that can unify more development efforts, or if not needed, at least a marketing presence to raise funds. E.g politicians usually don’t understand a word of tech, and you’d need something like “The open source interoperable alternative to Android and iOS” to be appealing instead of coming with Alpine, Debian, etc. which will sound just geeky and fringe and it will be confusing which to fund and why, and subsequently none will get any substantial funding.

            • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I still think that it is important to standarize a canonical Linux core

              If you’re not aware, Ubuntu Touch is no longer operated or developed by Canonical, they abandoned the project in 2017. UT was then picked up by UBPorts, a community effort to keep alive what Canonical left behind.

              Personally, I don’t have a very high opinion of Canonical due to their use of CLAs, which also appear to be present in some fashion with UT and UBPorts as well:

              I agree that some standardization would likely be beneficial in some areas (such as focusing on a single Phone UI and polishing it up). PostmarketOS is making the most progress on getting real Linux on mobile, so if I had to pick one project to support monetarily, and one that could become mainstream, or partner with a manufacturer like GrapheneOS did with Motorola, I think that would be the project to back, IMHO.

              • linule@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I mean canonical the word, not company? name.

                And ok, interesting to know that PostmarketOS might be what’s closest to that.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I am seriously considering going to a Linux phone at some point in the future because what’s to stop Google from deciding that we can’t install apps even on AOSP? Like sure, for now it’s only going to be devices with Google Play services that won’t allow you to install your own apps, but who’s to say Android 19 won’t be released and completely kill the ability to install apps outside of the Play Store?