• deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 小时前

    What you’re saying sounds extremely interesting. Do you have any recommendations on resources that could help me delve deeper into this topic?

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 小时前

      Im no academic, so apologies for the lack of substance. I mostly just get stuck in rabbit holes reading about philosophy and consciousness while I should be working.

      Check out these theories for some interesting ideas:

      • Information Integration Theory
      • Global Workspace Theory
      • Recurrent Processing Theory
      • Higher Order Thought Theory

      My summarized take is that modeling consciousness is akin to modeling the three-body problem or the double-pendulum. Even if the system is deterministic and capable of being modeled, you’ll forever be bottlenecked by finite precision in your model. The system itself is one where errors grow exponentially. For example, tiny differences in the double pendulum’s initial angle (like 0.000001°) rapidly amplify over time to produce wildly different trajectories. It is computationally intractable without unlimited precision — hence, this is why I said you’d need to model the entire universe. This is deterministic chaos, and we have no reason to think human-brains aren’t heavily dependent on its utility.