Discord Alternatives

Beginning with a phased global rollout to new and existing users in early March, users may be required to engage in an age-verification process to change certain settings or access sensitive content. This includes age-restricted channels, servers, or commands and select message requests.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Unless they trade me a face scan of each Discord employee and member, I’m out. Enough is enough, nothing is free.

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love how photo-based age verification scanning is the worst of both worlds - it destroys your anonymity, but not in a way that makes it easier to run a community where you can ban a person by their digital ID since they can just make a new one with the same face since facial recognition is too crude for that.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I refuse to verify my age with a face scan or government ID for an online account/profile… It’s too easy to imagine how fucked up that will go.

    The more I delete profiles to platforms with unwanted disturbing features the more recluse I become. It must look to acquaintances that I don’t care to speak (to them) but what can I do? I cannot imagine convincing even computer-literate friends to switch to something - as they will have the same problem.

    Do I need to retire my Discord gaming server before I’m locked out of controlling it?

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You think they’ll let you access the account settings to delete the account without scanning your face first?

      • Unsung Rooster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        If they don’t they would open the door to people committing spam or abuse intentionally to receive a suspension as the next best thing. I know I’ll do it if they don’t let me delete my account.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          They won’t let you send messages without finishing verification

          • Unsung Rooster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Then I’ll email their support and be rude to them until they get fed up. I’m sure I can be nasty enough in some way to get them to suspend me no matter how bad they want me.

      • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Just log in with a third party client where people in the Issues are complaining about being banned. Or use your Discord token and spam their API with illegal calls until they ban your account

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    It seems like the restriction should be lifted for accounts without verification after 5 years. After all, you’re not even allowed to sign up if you’re under 13, so by 5 years you have to be at least 18.

  • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Content filtering” is just corporate jargon for subjective censorship, dynamically and discriminately restricting access to knowledge. I abhor all censorship.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Care to make a remix of “7 Words You Can Never Say on TV” for blahaj? YOU might abhor all censorship, but your admins don’t, and I’m inclined to agree with them.

      • whelk@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah … A complete anything-goes free for all is always going to devolve into a nasty cesspool dominated by the worst actors who have driven everyone else away. I get it, there’s a lot of awful censorship out there, but on the flip side you need to have at least some rules to prevent the otherwise inevitable descent into the worst environment possible

    • whelk@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think a big thing that made it catch on was the ease of joining. Just send someone a link and boom, they’re in the intended server. No immediate registration process, no buttons or commands to use, just a single click and entering a username. For all that I dislike Discord about, they did that part really well

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    EXTREMELY INVASIVE SURVEILLANCE OPERATIONS ARE NOW PUT IN PLACE FOR you to have a better sense of community and meaningful communication <3

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Drop anything that’s not opensource and federated, except if you want to live the enshitification process over and over.

      Matrix might be the closest to Discord. XMPP should also be considered.

      • whelk@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m still trying to understand why XMPP isn’t more widely used. Probably the whole no single centralized service thing like most other federated protocols/services

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          XMPP biggest issues:

          • The absurdly and laugably slowness of the protocol evolution on critically needed features: it was bleeding edge years back. The XSF totally screwed up the VoIP extension management. Google dropped a working out-of-the-box solution on the table in 2005: “Take it and use it! You’re welcome!”. They took 4 years to improve it before declaring the extension stable. Only then did clients start implementations, and bummer: the spec was not perfect, there were a lot of hiccups and “client A can make calls to B but not C” issues, because, who would have guessed, the only way to improve a spec at some point is to test it out there, and not stare at it and make some minor changes. By the time, most XMPP users of the time who wanted VoIP had moved on to others tools, XMPP went from at the top to very late. They’re doing it again with MIX (next gen rooms): the first draft is from 2015. It’s still “experimental”, though some servers team started implementation (such lack of patience…)
          • An ocean of servers/clients with no consistency. You get to Matrix, and you have Element for all platforms. It can be native code everywhere, but it’s the same look and feel. You can tell your pops “just install Element”. In the XMPP world, there is no equivalent, though Snikket seems to be going there (consistent UI across platforms): all clients are different, different UI, platform specific with different set of features, some are a 1 guy project. If you’re not guided by a tek-savvy person, you have no idea where to start.

          With all that said, I run a server for our family and its resources consumption is barely a blip on the radar. The lightest Matrix servers are an order of magnitude hungrier. And the difference increases with scale!

          XMPP is the absolute best solution to multiply small servers, a very good thing for a healthy federation.

          • whelk@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Appreciate the info, thanks for taking the time to reply. I loved when Google was using XMPP for their chat just because that meant I could chat with people who insisted on using their Google accounts, without having to use one myself

    • Unsung Rooster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I hope people using fake IDs to bypass it becomes common knowledge. Felony or not it’s effective and the ID verifying part isn’t.

    • 18107@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Zulip is great for text based communities, but doesn’t have built in voice or video.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is the point where you need to teach a short, sharp lesson to companies by burning it to the ground.

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    One of my friends hit me with the “they already know everything about me” line on this one and literally said they’d give Discord “anything”, so I don’t think I’m gonna convince my group to move y’all. At least my best friend is educated enough at this point to be interested in moving so I’ll still be investigating options.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It seemed mostly fake to me. The dead giveaway was all the tech support forums that pushed themselves onto Discord. That makes so little sense it MUST be fake.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I am almost 70. I will just use a pic of good ol Harold. Will be funny to see if it accepts him.