Seems the country is not aligned with the views on Lemmy.

  • sobchak@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think that’s changed a bit. Hooters went bankrupt, and many local governments have heavy restrictions on strip clubs, such as no nipples can be shown, no physical contact, no license to serve liquor, etc.

    • guy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And that just makes the whole deal weirder. No physical contact is reasonable of course. But have a person be practically naked, dancing sensually is fine, unless there’s nipples. Can’t have that, it’s too much.

      The US is very weird.

      • sobchak@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        I think the laws are just meant as a soft-ban. There may be legal complications with outright banning strip clubs. The no physical contact takes away what I think make up stripper’s largest income source, and no nipples and alcohol makes it a less attractive place to go. I had a few hours to waste in a city once, waiting on a flight, and walked into one of these strip clubs. There was only one stripper there, one bartender, and I was the only customer; so I’m guessing it really did hurt the market.