- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Unless publishing gatekeepers adopt drastically more equitable practices and become partners in disseminating knowledge, they will continue to lose ground to open access alternatives, legal or otherwise.
Funny how that plays out, considering the data collection of LLMs have to dance around the copyright issue.
Not that I agree with many of people that say looking at a picture and adjusting weights is considered “stealing an image”.
If $1 of public money was involved in a study, its results should be public domain.
Okay but then how will the corporate goblins exploit us by land lording it?
They can suck it.
Let’s have the scientists’ and governments’ patents sold to them for pennies!! /s
No, no, the scientists owe the companies. For, uh.
The scientists owe the companies!
Piracy! For SCIENCE!
Psyhub got me through my fieldwork.





